MaxVal Blog

    Filter by Category
    Filter by Category

    Go Back to Homepage

    Court Shuts Down Patent Infringement Case Against Amazon.com

    court-shuts-down-patent-infringement-case-against-amazon-com

    The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has dismissed a lawsuit against Amazon.com filed by TriDim Innovations claiming patent infringement.

    TriDim filed a suit on Nov 30th 2015 for infringing two patents (U.S. Patent No. 5,838,326 and 5,847,709) on a "computer controlled display system” which it acquired from Xerox Corp. It claims that Amazon.com uses similar software for its Kindle Fire.

    The patents describe a three-dimensional computer document workspace that allows users to consolidate a large number of documents by touching, dropping and flicking them into three separate places in accordance to their usage.

    Amazon.com argued that the patents were invalid under section 101 as applied in the Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd v. CLS Bank Int'l in 2014. In the Alice case, the Supreme Court expressed that computer claims are eligible for patents if there is significantly more than an abstract idea.

    TriDim reasoned that separating its computer display into three spaces limits their invention to a specific system, and hence it is not an abstract idea.

    The judge of the case, James Donato found the patent to be invalid under Alice as it was an abstract idea of retrieval and arranging of documents. He ruled it out by saying it did not establish an inventive concept and is a “common solution to a common problem.”

    The court said that the TriDim patents did not require any specific hardware or software that would help a user to move and place files within the system. Furthermore, it found that there was an overuse of the word “circuitry” but the invention had nothing to with circuitry. It also said that inclusion of smart words does not mean that the creation is an innovative concept.

    Due to all of these assertions, the court gave verdict in favor of Amazon.com and dismissed the lawsuit. The ruling came out on Sept 19, 2016, just days before the patents were about to expire.

    According to the USPTO data and MaxVal’s own research, here is a detailed history of this infringement case

    Type Names
    Case Number 3:15-cv-05477
    Court California Northern District Court
    Filed date 12/02/2015
    Judge James Donato
    Plaintiff Tridim Innovations LLC
    Plaintiff Attorney Steven Todd Lowe
    Plaintiff Law Firm Lowe & Associates, P.C.
    Defendant Amazon.Com, Inc.
    Defendant Attorney Daniel Thomas Shvodian
    Defendant Law Firm Perkins Coie LLP
    Product Various versions of the Kindle Fire, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle Fire HDX, and Fire phone - products that incorporate the “carousel” feature
    Patent US5838326|US5847709
    Closed date 9/19/2016
    Basis of Termination Judgment on the Merits
    Outcome of District court judgment Favor of Defendant
    Comments Patent claims ruled invalid

     

     

     

     

     

    Go Back to Homepage

    Network-1 Announces Settlement of Patent Litigation With Polycom, Inc.
    Media Outlets Including Forbes Hit With Lawsuit

    About Author

    MaxVal
    MaxVal

    Related Posts
    MaxVal and Aistemos Extend Litigation Data Partnership
    MaxVal and Aistemos Extend Litigation Data Partnership
    MaxVal Patent Litigation Databank expands coverage to include Global Patent Litigation Data
    MaxVal Patent Litigation Databank expands coverage to include Global Patent Litigation Data
    Tech Giants Including Samsung Sued by KAIST Over Infringement of FinFET Technology
    Tech Giants Including Samsung Sued by KAIST Over Infringement of FinFET Technology

    Comment

    Subscribe To Blog

    Subscribe to Email Updates